EUPHRESCO III - Partners

Organizations

EUPHRESCO III is an international collaboration bringing together a diverse consortium of 35 partners covering the different world regions.

partners in the world

The EUPHRESCO III partners operate in the plant health field and have different missions and mandates: research programme owners, research programme managers, policy makers, regulators and research providers from the public and private sector. The diversity of missions and mandates of the EUPHRESCO III partners allows to secure all operations: identification of research priorities, project commissioning and funding, project implementation and use of the project outputs. Selected organizations play the role of champions within EUPHRESCO III, i.e. they coordinate the efforts within a region of the world or within a discipline.



  • Regional champions
  • Discipline champions
  • All partners

Africa


CAB International (CABI)
CAB International (CABI)

Australia


Plant Biosecurity Research Initiative (PBRI)
Plant Biosecurity Research Initiative (PBRI)

Caribbean, Central America & South America


National Institute for Agricultural Research and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC)
National Institute for Agricultural Research and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC)

Central Asia


Agency of Plant Protection and Quarantine of the Republic of Uzbekistan (KHA)
Agency of Plant Protection and Quarantine of the Republic of Uzbekistan (KHA)

Europe-North


Euphresco
Euphresco

Europe-South & Mediterranean


Euphresco
Euphresco

Europe-South & Mediterranean


International Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari)
International Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari)

North America


Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)

North America


US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA)
US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA)

Pacific Islands


New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd. (PFR)
New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd. (PFR)

South-East Asia


Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI)
Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI)

South-East Asia


Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)

Plant biotechnology industry


Abiopep S.L. (ABIOPEP)
Abiopep S.L. (ABIOPEP)

Plant diagnostic industry


Agdia EMEA (AGDIA)
Agdia EMEA (AGDIA)

Plant diagnostic industry


Bioreba AG (BIOREBA)
Bioreba AG (BIOREBA)

Seed industry


International Seed Federation (ISF)
International Seed Federation (ISF)

Tree and forest health


Competence Centre for Plant Health-Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ)
Competence Centre for Plant Health-Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ)

Tree and forest health


Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO)
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO)

Abiopep S.L. (ABIOPEP)
Abiopep S.L. (ABIOPEP)

Agdia EMEA (AGDIA)
Agdia EMEA (AGDIA)

Agency of Plant Protection and Quarantine of the Republic of Uzbekistan (KHA)
Agency of Plant Protection and Quarantine of the Republic of Uzbekistan (KHA)

Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI)
Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions (APAARI)

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)

Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES)
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES)

Benaki Phytopathological Institute (BPI)
Benaki Phytopathological Institute (BPI)

Bioreba AG (BIOREBA)
Bioreba AG (BIOREBA)

CAB International (CABI)
CAB International (CABI)

Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)

Competence Centre for Plant Health-Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ)
Competence Centre for Plant Health-Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (UNIBZ)

Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA)
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA)

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

Department of Plants, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Danish AgriFish Agency (DAA)
Department of Plants, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Danish AgriFish Agency (DAA)

Euphresco
Euphresco

Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (FPS)
Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment (FPS)

Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI)
Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI)

Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and food (EV-ILVO)
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and food (EV-ILVO)

French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES)
French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES)

International Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari)
International Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari)

International Seed Federation (ISF)
International Seed Federation (ISF)

Mediterranean Phytopathological Union (MPU)
Mediterranean Phytopathological Union (MPU)

Ministry of Agriculture, Plant Protection Service (MPRVSR)
Ministry of Agriculture, Plant Protection Service (MPRVSR)

Ministry of Food Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Food and Control (TAGEM)
Ministry of Food Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Food and Control (TAGEM)

Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture (REM)
Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture (REM)

National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinarian Research (INIAV)
National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinarian Research (INIAV)

National Institute for Agricultural Research and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC)
National Institute for Agricultural Research and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC)

Netherlands Food and Consumer Products Safety Authority (NVWA)
Netherlands Food and Consumer Products Safety Authority (NVWA)

New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd. (PFR)
New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd. (PFR)

Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO)
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO)

Plant Biosecurity Research Initiative (PBRI)
Plant Biosecurity Research Initiative (PBRI)

Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA)
Science and Advice for Scottish Agriculture (SASA)

Swedish Board of Agriculture (SJV)
Swedish Board of Agriculture (SJV)

The State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service (GIORIN)
The State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service (GIORIN)

The State Plant Service under the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania (VATZUM)
The State Plant Service under the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania (VATZUM)

US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA)
US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA)

Membership

Benefits and added value from research coordination and collaboration

Research funders

  • Collaboration creates a more diverse and critical mass of expertise to deliver more output compared to separate small projects.
  • Transnational collaboration enables the efficient use of national research funds and personnel resources by pooling them.
  • Collaboration gives access to information from national phytosanitary research programmes.
  • Coordination finds synergies and complementarities among research programmes and avoids duplication.
  • Coordination enables faster funding and commissioning of transnational work.

Regulators

  • Collaboration links the challenges faced by countries to the problem-solving capabilities of research organisations.
  • Collaboration allows research on pests in areas where they already occur, rather than in expensive quarantine facilities.
  • Collaboration builds mutual trust and confidence and contributes to a wider adoption of standards. programmes.
  • Coordination supports the sharing of information on national research in areas facing similar phytosanitary risks and problems.
  • Coordination gives the opportunity to shape research agendas across countries.

Research organisations

  • Collaboration enables sharing of knowledge and infrastructures and development of expertise.
  • Collaboration strengthens the links between different players and favours multi-disciplinary approaches.
  • Collaboration increases the visibility of research activities and use/re-use by the various stakeholders.
  • Collaboration produces more and higher quality outputs from joint transnational projects than partners could achieve on their own.

Join the network

Name is required
Email is required and needs to be a valid email address
Please select your type of organisation.
Message is required
Tick the box to submit form.